Search for: "Ray v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 809
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 11:51 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In an important free speech decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit this week in Bland v. [read post]
" The claim that the 7 ½-foot tall high-power microwave device — dubbed the "Pain Ray" by the media — will cause no injury is highly dubious, to say the least: There is good evidence from the United States military that it is capable of inflicting not only intolerable pain, but death. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:32 am by Stanley Taylor
United States Department of Transportation, Ray LaHood, Federal Highway Administration and Victor Mendez, Defendants, and Outdoor Advertising Association of America, Inc., Intervenor-Defendant, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No 13-cv-0093. [read post]
1 May 2009, 12:10 pm
VENTRIS (No. 07-1356) United States Supreme Court Opinion Decided: April 29, 2009 Respondent Donnie Ray Ventris and Rhonda Theel were charged with murder along with other crimes. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
How wonderful art thou, great state of the Gray Squirrel and the greatest two minutes in sports! [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Some people decry the "softening" of the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
A Law360 article today, High Court Says Fee Requests Don't Shift Appeal Deadlines, reports on Ray Haluch Gravel Company v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 4:16 am
This argument was recently repudiated by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Latin American Music Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:11 pm by Allison Walton
The Sunshine State is shining a new ray of light on the information governance and eDiscovery space with new civil procedure laws addressing electronically stored information (ESI). [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 3:53 pm by Anna Christensen
Below, Ray Seilie of Harvard Law School previews Berghuis v. [read post]