Search for: "Richardson v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 1,166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:14 am by Naomi Shatz
Richardson a half-century ago: “There can be no doubt that our Nation has had a long and unfortunate history of sex discrimination. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:05 am by Gerard Magliocca
I want to make one further observation about the separate opinion if Judge Richardson, who concurred in the judgment. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 11:15 am by Phil Dixon
Decisions that may be of interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am by Eric Segall
He rightly criticizes the post-1960's judicial fabrication of an injury-in-fact requirement, and he thinks the Court went wrong in the 1970's with cases like United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
United States On 31 January 2022, the EARN IT Act was reintroduced to the Senate by Senator Richard Blumenthal and 18 co-sponsors from both parties. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Tex. and unsuccessfully appealed by Ericsson's adversary in that case, HTC, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]