Search for: "Robert Chesney"
Results 121 - 140
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 pm
Wittes, joined by University of Texas law professor Robert M. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 8:51 am
Or consider Robert Chesney’s recent post at Lawfare on what he shrewdly calls the “Pandora’s Box Critique of Drones,” a critique that encompasses the “arms race” and several other “look-what-the-US-has-unleashed” arguments that have many advocates at this moment. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 8:16 am
That’s an important acknowledgment, often overlooked, about the nature even of covert uses of force.Or consider Robert Chesney’s recent post at Lawfare on what he shrewdly calls the “Pandora’s Box Critique of Drones,” a critique that encompasses the “arms race” and several other “look-what-the-US-has-unleashed” arguments that have many advocates at this moment. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:08 pm
Also according to the article, authored by Professor Robert M. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
” See Robert M Chesney, State Secrets and the Limits of National Security Litigation, 75 George Wash L Rev 1249, 1309-10 (2007). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:22 pm
See BENJAMIN WITTES, ROBERT M. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:32 pm
by Kevin Jon Heller The New York Times has the story today: Defense Secretary Robert M. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Chesney (Texas), David D. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:31 am
As Robert Chesney notes at Lawfare, the US government does not appear to take a blanket position that a US citizen deemed to be a targetable participant in a terrorist group in an armed conflict has no due process rights outside of the US in any sense, on the one hand. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Hasen is rightly concerned about the impact of deep fakes on democracy, given their potential not just to make the public believe false things are true, but also to make them believe true things are false— the “Liar’s Dividend,” as Robert Chesney and Danielle Keats Citron call it. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:41 pm
Robert Chesney (Lawfare) blogged about it first; his post is also much worth reading. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:42 pm
" I won't go that far in critiquing Aftergood's reading, rather I think the fact that we disagree about this highlights the problem with the rule and the need for clarity (a point echoed by Robert Chesney here). [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 4:07 am
Citron and Robert Chesney coined the term “liar’s dividend” to describe how deepfakes can be weaponized to discredit authentic evidence. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:23 pm
Chesney has just published. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:18 am
University of Texas law professor Robert Chesney has also written a useful summary of the opinion for his national security law e-mail distribution list which I've reproduced below the fold. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:47 pm
I’ve been meaning to blog on this, but meanwhile Robert Chesney poses the following question over at the Lawfare blog (where you can find links to these articles and an expanded discussion):[W]hat really struck me about the stories was their common reference to a particular legal argument. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
As far as US domestic law goes, the weeds — the work that Robert Chesney is doing on the interrelationships between Title 10 and Title 50 authorities, the military and the CIA, particularly — matter a great deal. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm
The final point is, however, that the CIA is conducting these operations under the President’s direct order; someone has given serious thought to the diplomatic and other costs and benefits of the CIA versus the military conducting cross border raids.(4) News reports, as Robert Chesney has noted several times, make reference to different internal government legal authorities governing activities of the CIA and the uniformed military. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 6:05 am
The “Liar’s Dividend” These capabilities become particularly dangerous when combined with what experts call the “liar’s dividend” — a phenomenon defined by professors Robert Chesney and Danielle Citron, in which the mere existence of deepfake technology allows bad actors to dismiss authentic evidence as synthetic. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:55 pm
I've been meaning to blog on this, following on Deborah's post below discussing the AP story, but meanwhile Robert Chesney poses the following question over at the Lawfare blog (where you can find links to these articles and an expanded discussion): [W]hat really struck me about the stories was their common reference to a particular legal argument. [read post]
