Search for: "Russo v Russo" Results 121 - 140 of 436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Tenured teacher unwilling to improve her pedagogical skills despite being provided with substantial assistance terminated from her positionBroad v New York City Bd. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Russo, Odious to the Constitution: The Educational Implications of Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 7:50 am
Reflections on the Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement Notes and Comments Silvia Borelli & Maria Chiara Vitucci, The Italian Response to Exploitation of Migrant Workers in the Agricultural Sector: Between Criminalization and PreventionNatalino Ronzitti, The Agreement Between Italy and Niger on Defence Cooperation Maria Rosaria Mauro, “National Security”, Foreign Investments and National Screening Procedures: The Italian Regime Gustavo Minervini, Viola v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Russo and the Constitutionality of Reason-Based Abortion Bans,(109 Georgetown Law Journal Online 115 (2020)).Kenneth A. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:55 am by Amy Howe
Russo, as well as at Howe on the Court, where it was originally published. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:21 pm by Josh Blackman
Russo (2020)—Read Chief Justice Roberts's concurrence (pp. 318-322) and Justice Kavanaugh's dissent (pp. 342-343). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In an action to recover damages for alleged legal malpractice, pro se plaintiff moves for an order granting default judgment against Russo & Gould LLP and Russo & Toner LLP (collectively, Russo defendants) (Motion Seq. 1), Russo defendants cross-move for an order extending their time to appear in the action (Motion Seq. 2), and Daniel M. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Citing Russo v NYC Department of Education, 25 NY3d 946, the court rejected the Board’s contention to the contrary and held that “the excessiveness of a penalty is a basis upon which an arbitration award may be vacated.The court ruled that in this instance “the penalty of termination was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, citing the so-called Pell Doctrine, Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School… [read post]