Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman"
Results 121 - 140
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2025, 12:31 pm
But Seth Barrett Tillman has debunked that myth--no order ran against Lincoln, so there was no order for him to ignore. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:11 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I also did not take a position on this question. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
"] In May, Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed on Lawfare whether the President was an "Officer of the United States" for purposes of the federal officer removal statute. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 5:30 am
"] Seth Barrett Tillman and I published a new essay in the American Spectator concerning Special Counsel Jack Smith's pending appeal to the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:38 am
For sure, Barrett was not among them, as she would tell us in her concurrence. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am
This brief, which is on behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman and the Landmark Legal Foundation, contends that Special Counsel Jack Smith is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:36 am
(You can see all the briefs that Seth Barrett Tillman and I filed here.) [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 12:35 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman ruminated on holding litigants in contempt in the context of emergency orders. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
See Josh Blackman & Seth Barrett Tillman, Offices and Officers of the Constitution, Part II: The Four Approaches, 61 South Texas Law Review 321, 421 (2022) (concluding that the Speaker and Senate President Pro Tempore are "Officers" for purposes of the Succession Clause, and can succeed to the presidency.) [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
Nebraska, Justice Barrett rejected the validity of substantive cannons altogether. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On Thursday, February 15, 2024, Professor Mark Graber published a post on Balkinization titled "The Enforcement Act of 1870: Disqualification Myths and Realities. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
” Tillman filed an amicus brief in support of Trump with Professor Josh Blackman of South Texas College of Law Houston. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:41 pm
During President Trump's second impeachment trial, Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote that elected officials, including the President, retained their First Amendment right to freedom of speech. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I have written quite a bit about whether parties can seek affirmative relief under the Constitution in the absence of a federal cause of action. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 1:40 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman highlighted a passage from Judge Wynn's concurrence in the Emoluments Clauses en banc decision: Without a doubt, a lawsuit brought by the State of Maryland and the District of Columbia against the President of the United States catches attention outside the walls of the courthouse. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:59 pm
" In a series of amicus briefs, Seth Barrett Tillman and I contended that these "official capacity" suits were not proper. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman During most impeachment trials, the Vice President presides over the Senate. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 1:46 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
