Search for: "Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Santee Sioux Tribe, 254 F.3d 728 (8th Cir. 2001) — 254_f.3d_728 United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Marie Tribe of Chippewa IndiansThe Path to the BenchIn the history of the United States, only four Native Americans have been appointed to the federal bench which includes only one Native American woman. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 4:08 pm
The Longs are both enrolled members of the Cheyenne River Sioux Indian Tribe; petitioner is an unaffiliated South Dakota corporation. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:33 pm by Monica Williamson
Assist as the lead staff attorney in judicial proceedings and litigation in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
United States, 245 F. 411 (8th Cir.1917), women 1/4 to 3/8 Chippewa were held to be Indian; in Makah Indian Tribe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 11:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Specifically, Appellants allege they are lineal descendants of the Mdewakanton band of the Sioux tribe who were loyal to the United States during the 1862 uprising (“loyal Mdewakanton”). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
Reply of petitioner Charles Mix County Title: Yankton Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:39 pm by Courtney Minick
Finally, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion interpreting the “bad men” provisions in the 1868 Laramie Treaty between the Sioux Indian Tribe and the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:39 pm by Courtney Minick
Finally, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion interpreting the “bad men” provisions in the 1868 Laramie Treaty between the Sioux Indian Tribe and the United States. [read post]