Search for: "Smith v. Miller" Results 121 - 140 of 618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
And their lack of choice, under Smith and Miller, would have had no effect on the Court’s holding. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:41 am
Chris Miller, an excellent former student of mine, has pointed out Woods v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am by Eric Goldman
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19… [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 7:36 am by Joseph Blocher and Eric Ruben
Miller of Duke Law School, they filed an amicus brief in support of neither side in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:17 am by Steven Boutwell
By: Michael J. deBarros On October 22, 2019, the Louisiana Supreme Court issued its opinion in the Smith v. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 9:11 am by Steve Kalar
In Judge Smith’s view, the Thornhill panel changed Ninth law (LeMay) with no intervening Supreme Court decision: a Miller v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am by Patricia Hughes
Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s decision to prorogue the UK Parliament last week reminded us of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s twice-proroguing of the Canadian Parliament in the space of about a year. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise and… [read post]