Search for: "Spells v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2012, 6:40 pm
In Michael Jordan v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
So, with apologies to any readers who may have been awaiting it with bated [please note correct spelling] breath, here's the story.The judgment referred to above is that of the Second Chamber of the Court of Justice the European Union (CJEU) in Case C‑98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA, Manufacture des Montres Rolex SA, a request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Supreme Court), Denmark [a big Katpat to the CJEU, in dispensing with an… [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:53 am
The nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court doesn’t spell the death of Roe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am
North Carolina adopted Whren under the state constitution in State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 6:31 am
In Peter v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:41 pm
Last week, in Woods v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
In another case, the Court agreed to spell out the scope of the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
After granting certiorari in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 4:40 am
Knauer (Temple University - Beasley School of Law) has posted LAWRENCE v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:58 am
In the case of Sanon v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Instead, the “APA” referred to in the case description, being the Texas Administrative Procedure Act, spells out the formal method of proposing and adopting rules such as those interpreting the state’s Tax Code. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
At issue in Caproc Third Ave., LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:11 am
While there, he litigated, NAACP v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:16 pm
U.S., spelling out when the evidence privilege based on “state secrets” applies, does not compel to total dismissal of a case where the government claims secrets may be at stake. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:40 am
Which -- not coincidentally -- is partly why that's precisely what every single state but two in fact do.I don't doubt that Boies and his colleagues wrote a great brief. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:53 pm
(citing, Martin v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 5:15 am
See Energy Heating, LLC v. [read post]
