Search for: "State v. Bill" Results 121 - 140 of 21,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2023, 12:30 am by Frank Cranmer
Betül Durmuş, Strasbourg Observers: Cupiał v Poland: what could this case offer on religious upbringing? [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Miho Suzuki v Greenberg 2023 NY Slip Op 31289(U) April 21, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159360/2021 Judge: David B. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:31 pm by Zoe Stern
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:28 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletin United States v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:08 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  And although the one Supreme Court case to address the underpinnings of Amd14, 1935's Perry v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:34 am by David Pocklington
 On 28 April the Home Office updated its Fact Sheet on the Bill, which indicated those measures within the Act to commence on 3 May 2023, v infra. [read post]
The bill’s co-sponsors wrote a memo detailing the importance of the legislation, saying: In the landmark 2020 decision Bostock v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:20 am by Kurt R. Karst
The new certification criterion is further laid out and explained in a special approval status rule for certain subsequent applicants at proposed FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(v): (v) SPECIAL APPROVAL STATUS RULE FOR CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT APPLICANTS. [read post]
1 May 2023, 2:50 pm by Jason Shinn
The CFO denied through his legal counsel doing anything illegal (See proceedings from Oakland County, People of the State of Michigan v Brian Michael White CR #2021-276874-FH). [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
The Home Office rejected the request, stating that it is not in the public interest to disclose any of the requested information. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:51 am by Just Security
Proposed State Legislation  New York State Assembly Bill A2389, Restrict Insurrections from Office Taking (RIOT) Act   New York State Senate Bill S888, Restrict Insurrectionists from Office Taking (RIOT) Act  Connecticut State Senate Bill 244, An Act Concerning Eligibility to Hold Public Office or be Employed by the State or any Municipality Pennsylvania State Assembly Bill 2672, A Joint… [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:49 am
JOIN TODAY -- FREE MEMBERSHIP Industry Recruiter Sues Morgan Stanley Citing Racial DiscriminationANTHONY FLETCHER,  Plaintiff, v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Mr Bloom’s brief was to make recommendations to the Secretary of State on how government should engage with faith groups in England. [read post]