Search for: "State v. Investors Security Corporation" Results 121 - 140 of 1,459
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2010, 8:04 pm
(being the general criminal law) and not under any specific corporate or securities legislation. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
U.S. companies will be allowed once again to exclude proxy access proposals from their corporate ballots, the Securities and Exchange Commission has decided. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 1:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint purports to be filed on behalf of two classes of investors: investors who purchased securities of VIH or, post-combination, of Bakkt, between March 31, 2021 (the date VIH filed its Form S-4 with the SEC in connection with the planned business combination) and November 19, 2021 (the trading date before the date Bakkt announced the need to restate the prior VIH financial statements); and investors who purchased common stock traceable to the Offering… [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
In addition to denying violation of federal securities laws, Chais stated three affirmative defenses. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
("USEC"), which provided uranium enrichment services to the United States government, was renegotiating a contract with a Russian corporation. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 5:00 am by Tracy Taylor
  First, the defendants questioned whether the securities fraud claims of the putative class in the case, including purchasers of securities on a French stock exchange, remained viable after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Note, however, that this figure does not include class action suits filed in state court or state court derivative suits, including those in the Delaware Court of Chancery. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 8:15 am by John Jascob
At issue is whether a defendant in a securities class action may rebut the presumption of classwide reliance recognized in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:39 am by Carl Neff
On May 31, 2019, the Court of Chancery issued a 57-page memorandum opinion ordering Facebook Inc. to provide certain corporate books and records to various plaintiff investors, in the case of In re Facebook Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Ct. 1061 (2018), that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction with federal courts over Securities Act claims and that actions asserting only Securities Act claims filed in state court could not be removed. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
Securities and Exchange Commission not to roll back investors' proxy access rights. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:36 am by Steve Bainbridge
Secrist also stated that various regulatory agencies had failed to act on similar charges made by Equity Funding employees. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
United States, 445 U.S. 222, 227 n.8 (1980) (quoting Judge Learned Hand’s statement in Gratz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:46 am by Doug Cornelius
Like in Howey, the investors are passive. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm by Francis Pileggi
Santa Fe that merger challenges were the province of  state law and not classic federal securities laws because they focused on fiduciary duty, not securities deceit and fraud, the Delaware state courts rose to prominence, the professors agreed. [read post]