Search for: "State v. Quinn"
Results 121 - 140
of 890
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 8:10 am
Richardson, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm
Uhrich at various German patent trials while he was a Quinn Emanuel associate, and at a couple of conferences in the area.As a result of CIPLITEC's inclusive approach, there were 200 or 300 people in the audience as per my estimate; most of them were students, but I also spotted a number of law professors, patent attorneys, and patent litigators. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein &Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
In the case of Wasnetsky v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:32 am
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein & Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 8:05 am
In Quinn v Quinn, 2019 WL 2518147 (W.D. [read post]
11 May 2019, 7:18 am
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Quinn and his wife Sandra Quinn settled a trust in the United States which dealt with assets in the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 3:08 pm
In Quinn Estate v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:15 pm
In Quinn v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
., on Friday, April 5, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, California, Diversity, Institutional Investors, Institutional voting, Proxy advisors, SB 826, State law, Surveys Review and Analysis of 2018 U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:16 am
And I learned that just on Tuesday the court lifted the competition law-based injunction, but hasn't stated the reasons yet.That one is a sideshow (deceptive advertising) of a sideshow (a fake patent injunction that had no serious impact), while the one that really matters is the Apple, Foxconn et al. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
In the 2014 Harris v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm
Quinn of The Employment Law Group. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:44 pm
Benisek and Rucho v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
The Court stated in passing that the counter was required to be at least 36 inches in length, a misreading of the relevant standard.* Boitnott v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 10:42 am
-Austin 2004, pet. denied); Quinn v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
The ongoing Qualcomm v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
In that same vein, following is a discussion of a (less recent) decision from the United States Supreme Court, Elgin v. [read post]