Search for: "State v. Small" Results 121 - 140 of 16,739
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
 To the extent the Judicial Conference guidance purports to address this problem it only states that the JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet should state "the remedy sought has implication beyond the parties before the court or that the case seeks to bar or mandate statewide or nationwide enforcement of a state of federal law. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm by Bona Law PC
Something like this is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:57 pm by Josh Blackman
One of the most thorough analyses of this issue came in Steve Vladeck's amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:54 am by Cassie J. Edgar
Constitutionality On March 1, 2024, the Corporate Transparency Act met a judicial roadblock in National Small Business United v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:24 am by Holly
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ruled that the Corporate Transparency Act is unconstitutional in National Small Business United v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  I have asked a few Canadians about this, and they all insist that these examples are isolated and that the number of people involved is too small to matter. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:54 pm by Josh Blackman
In some regards, this Judicial Conference proposal reminds me of Justice Barrett's well-intentioned but horribly-misguided concurrence in Trump v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 10:03 am by Sarah E. Straub
Recently, all eyes in the legal community turned to a federal district court in Alabama in the case of National Small Business United v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 1:23 pm by Margot Tierney
Janet Yellen, Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB ︎Notice Regarding National Small Business United v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 1:23 pm by Margot Tierney
Janet Yellen, Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB ︎Notice Regarding National Small Business United v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am by Bob Ambrogi
” That fight went all the way to the Supreme Court, resulting in 2020 in a watershed ruling for public access to primary legal materials, Georgia v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”              There is no doubt that Hasen’s proposed amendment would cure, for once and for all, the lacunae announced (and embraced) by the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Giles Peaker
But why the costs of maintaining its office should be the responsibility of this small group of tenants, rather than being funded by its overall income from a few thousand lessees, is not explained and cannot be justified. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Public records laws exist in no small part because corruption, inefficiency and other malfeasance happen, regardless of the size of the government. [read post]