Search for: "State v. Wood" Results 121 - 140 of 2,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2009, 4:47 am
Trent Taylor, a partner with McGuire Woods, has published "State of North Carolina v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 10:30 am by Paul Caron
Following up on my previous post, Supreme Court Grants Cert. to Decide § 6662 Penalty for Overstatement of Basis: the Government has filed its opening brief in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Monday Wood v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:28 am by Megen Miller
In the published opinion Doe v Boyle, Docket No. 320102 (September 22, 2015), after a lengthy battle, the Court of Appeals awarded court-appointed guardian ad litem Thomas Woods costs and attorney's fees for his services on a personal injury suit as a guardian ad litem for the defendant minor child. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:20 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) ZO (Somalia) & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 442 (20 May 2009) Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2009] EWCA Civ 414 (21 May 2009) Baker v Quantum Clothing Group [2009] EWCA Civ 499 (22 May 2009) [...] [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:16 pm by Brett Alcala
On June 7, 2010, an IMH Secured Loan Fund Unitholder, filed a proposed class action lawsuit captioned, Charlotte Wood, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 6:16 pm
On June 7, 2010, an IMH Secured Loan Fund Unitholder, filed a proposed class action lawsuit captioned, Charlotte Wood, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:24 am by admin
The Supreme Court has granted the government’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]