Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 13,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2011, 11:23 am
  At least for civil procedure nuts.Which matters, because the United States can only remove "interpleader" claims against it to federal court pursuant to 28 USC 2410.But the Ninth Circuit correctly holds that if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck . . . . [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:21 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:21 am by Adam Feldman
The Supreme Court has heard many more cases that originated in California state courts and were appealed from the California Supreme Court or from a California court of appeals than cases from any other state’s courts. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 9:31 am by Tryn T. Stimart and Jean E. Dassie
This post is intended as a snapshot of the CRISPR-Cas9 legal landscape in the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
This defense comes from a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case (also, confusingly enough, named City of New York v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:59 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Brown is widely cited as one of the most significant decisions interpreting the United States Supreme Court’s AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 12:07 pm
Last week, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California unsealed the indictment in the United States of America v. [read post]
Vill. of Fox Lake and the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1473 v. [read post]
Vill. of Fox Lake and the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1473 v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The original complaint, in the United States District Court of Central California, can be found here. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:02 pm by Immigration Prof
Last week, the Trump administration filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to hear United States v. [read post]