Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 3,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2017, 2:16 pm by Tara Breslow-Testa, Esq.
Projections by New Jersey United for Marijuana Reform and New Jersey Policy Perspective states a federal study estimating 365,900 people in New Jersey age 21 and over illegally use marijuana on a monthly basis, consuming 2.53 million ounces a year. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The Department of Justice announced yesterday that a proposed Consent Order (full text) has been filed with a New Jersey federal district court in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:00 pm by Jay S. Becker
In a departure from United States Supreme Court precedent, the New Jersey Supreme Court recently ruled that each paycheck resulting from a prior discriminatory pay decision constitutes an actionable act of discrimination under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD). [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 2:09 pm by James P. Yudes, Esq.
 Over time, the New Jersey Supreme Court established a standard called the Baures standard (created in the case of Baures v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 7:30 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
  In September 2018, the first court decision applying the New Jersey Equal Pay Act was decided by the United States District Judge William Martini of the District of New Jersey in Perrotto v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 6:54 am by Joel R. Brandes
New Jersey, 2022) the  principal contested issues were  (1) whether Respondent had “wrongfully retained” A.L.S. and A.H.S. in New Jersey as of July 10, 2019 without Petitioner’s consent; (2) if she had, whether the United States or Belgium was the children’s “habitual residence” immediately prior to the date of wrongful retention; and (3) if the habitual residence was Belgium, whether Respondent had… [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by Andrew Thomas
Xio Interactive, Inc. 863 F.Supp.2d 394 United States District Court for the District of New Jersey May 30, 2012 We were recently talking among ourselves about […] [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Kenny A., the United States Supreme Court recognized that, under federal law, an attorney fee enhancement is permitted only in "rare" and "exceptional" circumstances. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:31 pm
The internetdefamationlawblog, describing State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:28 pm by Evan M. Levow
The New Jersey Supreme Court issued a controversial ruling in late September 2015, State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:54 pm by David Krenkel
The New Jersey Appellate Division followed the principles and guidance of the federal Title VII jurisprudence, and the United States Supreme Court's decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]