Search for: "State v. Alex"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
The SEC’s Office of Economic Analysis’ 2009 Study on Section 404 states this point more explicitly: “Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act requires companies to maintain effective ICFR, while Section 404 requires management to report on the effectiveness of ICFR. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court opinion, issued this morning, reverses the earlier state court opinion in Preston v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
This Article disagrees with both positions and argues that the new Supreme Court Equal Protection jurisprudence as reflected in cases such as United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:54 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Visita nuestro Observatorio COVID-19 en Puerto Rico Por el licenciado Alex Omar Rosa Ambert El Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos emitió una opinión el pasado martes, 20 de abril de 2020 en Ramos v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 7:17 am
In so holding, the Court clarified that when a party challenges an entire contract is unenforceable, not just the arbitration clause, the arbitrator decides that issue, even if the alternative forum is an administrative agency under state law.The case is Preston v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:59 pm
As Jerry states in the video, what this issue looks to be driving towards is, “a showdown in the U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 11:05 am
United States, Dirks v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:26 am
by guest blogger Alex F. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:40 am
Boston v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:51 am
Below, Stanford Law School’s Alex Harris recaps the opinion handed down yesterday in Renico v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 6:34 pm
Acorda Therapeutics v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 6:34 pm
Acorda Therapeutics v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm
” The focus of his speech was United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
., the court will hear oral arguments in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:28 am
United States, 2020 WL 398625 (D.C. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:13 pm
Unfortunately, Judge Alex Kozinski's dissent points to an alarming policy laundering trend in its reliance on the Beijing Treaty for Audiovisual Performances, a deeply problematic international agreement that the United States has signed but not yet ratified. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:24 pm
Money but not by SCOTUS, see United States v. [read post]
