Search for: "State v. C. G. B." Results 121 - 140 of 2,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2016, 10:23 pm by Ben Allen
The Sixth Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:01 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
As the Court noted, Congress expressly stated that “the court” was tasked with deciding certain issues in Sections 502, 503, 504(c), and 505 but omitted the phrase from Section 504(b). [read post]
28 Nov 2024, 5:58 am by Roel van Woudenberg
First, against the Opposition Division's decision that the (second) intervention of 2 March 2023 (cf. point V. above) was inadmissible. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
Accordingly, defendants conclude, [Lazette] fails to state a claim under § 2701. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
In оthеr wоrdѕ, federal and state gоvеrnmеntѕ may рlасе tаx liens fоr unраіd іnсоmе tаxеѕ, whіlе lосаl gоvеrnmеntѕ mау рlасе tаx lіеnѕ fоr unраіd lосаl income… [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:43 am by Diane Tweedlie
Its introduction therefore requires the consent of the proprietor/respondent (see G 9/91 and G 10/91, Reasons 18). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
As a result of their disagreements, the IRC submitted, as a first set of maps, two proposed redistricting plans to the legislature — maps from each party delegation — as is constitutionally permitted if a single consensus map fails to garner sufficient votes (see NY Const, art III, § 5-b [g]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
As a result of their disagreements, the IRC submitted, as a first set of maps, two proposed redistricting plans to the legislature — maps from each party delegation — as is constitutionally permitted if a single consensus map fails to garner sufficient votes (see NY Const, art III, § 5-b [g]). [read post]