Search for: "State v. Contreras"
Results 121 - 140
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2025, 8:24 am
However, Article V speaks of ratifications by state legislatures. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 4:47 am
However, Article V speaks of ratifications by state legislatures. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:24 pm
Gómez, Gilberto Guerrero-Rocca, Nicolás Vassallo, María Gabriela De Abreu Negrón, Karen Longaric, & Fabián Villeda Corona, Revisión de laudos arbitrales de inversión 2020: 2º Encuentro Anual (Santiago de Chile, 07-08/06/2021) Lucas Carlos Lima, As medidas cautelares da Corte Internacional de Justiça no caso Ucrânia e Federação Russa Eshan Dauhoo, The Challenges faced by Women Legal Academics (Panel Discussion) … [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
United States On 13 June 2023, the Texas Governor signed HB4 to make Texas the tenth state to have a comprehensive privacy law. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 4:00 pm
Contreras v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 4:00 pm
Contreras v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/840393.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am
Qualcomm rulingFormer Secretary of Homeland Security, former FTC chairman, and conservative think tank dismiss Qualcomm's and DOJ's "national security" argumentsFormer Secretary of Homeland Security, former FTC chairman, and conservative think tank dismiss Qualcomm's and DOJ's "national security" argumentsFour IT industry bodies support FTC against Qualcomm's appeal: once again, The Industry v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On the same day, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWCA Civ 1073, dismissing by a majority the appeal from the decision of Nicol J, which struck out the Appellant’s claims in libel and data protection as abuse. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 4:43 pm
In Z.B. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
Brad Biddle, Arizona State University College of Law (with Jorge Contreras & Vigdis Bronder) Certification (and) Marks – Understanding Usage and Practices Among Standards Organizations Some mismatch in definition of “certification” marks—some organizations deliberately avoid that term. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm
On April 12, 2022, Judge Claire V. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
At Understanding the ADA, William Goren notes that the court’s opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
Contreras Presidential Scholar and Professor of Law S.J. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:06 am
Carasco v Schlesinger 2022 NY Slip Op 33021(U) September 8, 2022. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:41 pm
Key Case Studies from Dallas: Contreras v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:41 pm
Key Case Studies from Dallas: Contreras v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
