Search for: "State v. Royal" Results 121 - 140 of 1,998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2022, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
  The case of Banks v Cadwalladr has  been heard over 5 days in Court 13 at the Royal Courts of Justice by Mrs Justice Steyn. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
The legislature (the Chief Pleas) generally legislates by Laws, which are passed as a Projet de Loi and then receive Royal Assent. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 1106 The claimant was a member of the Saudi Arabian Royal Family and had failed to comply with an order that he personally sign a witness statement pertaining to disclosure matters in relation to his joint venture with the respondent for setting up a 3rd company. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
” 14.24: James Eadie QC notes that the royal prerogative is a freestanding source of power. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:45 am by traceydennis
Supreme Court Holland v Revenue and Customs & Anor [2010] UKSC 51 (24 November 2010) MA (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 49 (24 November 2010) Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Wilson & Anor (Scotland) [2010] UKSC 50 (24 November 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am by Jeff Redding
The ‘we’ here is not a royal one, but a social one. [read post]
26 May 2017, 5:41 pm by Injury at Sea
The fisherman was safely rescued by a nearby good Samaritan, the fishing vessel Crown Royal. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 5:28 am
BNA's United States Law Week reported in Vol. 75, No. 15 (Oct. 24, 2006) on the case Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 11:55 am by Benjamin Wittes
Department of State, has the following analysis of the International Court of Justice’s decision Friday in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:49 am
In British Waterways v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc [2012] EWHC 460 (Comm), the High Court held that sums paid by the claimant, British Waterways, in relation to liability for the death of two farmers when a tractor fell into a canal was covered by the policy issued by the defendant, Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc, and that the sums were not excluded as liability "arising out of" the operation of the tractor as a tool.The claimant pleaded guilty… [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:15 am
In two recent decisions, the United States Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the Seventh Circuit each split with the Second Circuit’s 2010 decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:55 am by Marissa Miller
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the decision in Kurns v. [read post]