Search for: "State v. Tate" Results 121 - 140 of 453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am by William S. Dodge
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am by Jocelyn Hutton
On Tuesday 7th and Wednesday 8th December the court will hear the case of Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
In Wall v Judicial Committee of the Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, (Alberta Ct. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
”  Justice Kagan argued that “[s]tate courts are—or at any rate, are supposed to be—the ‘ultimate expositors of state law,’” and “the corollary is that federal courts should refrain whenever possible from deciding novel or difficult state-law questions. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 12:00 pm by Sarah Tate Chambers
Anderson, Sarah Tate Chambers and Molly E. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eleanor Runde
Then, in 1952, the “Tate Letter,” a missive from Acting State Legal Adviser Jack B. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
By Phillip Tate and Michael Kiely Two cases filed in Sacramento County, City of Cerritos v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:15 am by Jen Kreder
Tate, Acting Legal Advisor in the Department of State, clarified:   [The U.S.] [read post]