Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Lucas"
Results 121 - 140
of 271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
I don't know any of the people involved in these facts.Background "Cemeteries and golf courses are the worst uses of real estate. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:24 pm
In the landmark Miranda v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:23 am
See Lucas v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
It is indeed, and our Kat-stats show that, in some cases, the number of people reading blogposts the week after they were first posted exceeds the number of folk who read them in their week of publication. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 11:42 pm
Lucas's Star Wars was an epic, mythological, space opera. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Lucas v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am
Lucas: Clickthrough is just infinitely higher. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
Petitioners had not been deprived of all economically beneficial or productive use of their property (Lucas v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
Petitioners had not been deprived of all economically beneficial or productive use of their property (Lucas v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Titanic v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 5:26 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Linde v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
“The analysis appears to be very similar to the approach that was taken in [Canada (Human Rights Commission) v.] [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
In 1992, Justice Scalia penned the opinion in Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council in which the Court ruled that regulations which deprive a landowner of “all economically productive or beneficial uses of land” require compensation absent the presence of a “common-law prohibition. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
In 1992, Justice Scalia penned the opinion in Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council in which the Court ruled that regulations which deprive a landowner of “all economically productive or beneficial uses of land” require compensation absent the presence of a “common-law prohibition. [read post]
8 May 2019, 8:49 am
Lucas Cty. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm
The support of Strasbourg jurisprudence was noted, in particular the cases of Sergey Kuznetsov v Russia [2008] ECHR 1170, Lucas v UK (App No 39013/02) 18 March 2003, and Appleby v UK (App No 44306/98). [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Lord Lucas proposes new UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 section to provide remedy for groundless copyright threats (1709 Copyright Blog) (Techdirt) US CAFC scraps point of novelty for design patents: International Seaway Trading Corp. v Walgreens (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Inventive Step) … [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
“The Bush v. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 6:25 am
” People v. [read post]
