Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Spencer" Results 121 - 140 of 277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jacob: real consumers in the box are perfectly normal people. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
Citing Chief Judge Kaye's concurrence in People v Wesley, the dissent faults the experts' opinions for lacking a proper foundation. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
* Unauthorized Use of Photograph to Create Fake Dating Profile Not a Violation of Lanham ActMarie-Andrée reports on Yuliana Avalos v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:04 am by Larry Tolchinsky
The Condominium Association will take action through a group of people elected to serve in that capacity. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The previous column noted the Spencer decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that discussed how intrusive such information can be and how extensive inferences can be made from a small amount of browsing data. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
 Will a lot of people seek to sneak survey evidence is, even where it shouldn't be? [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Spencer, 700 F.3d 317 (U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by John Gregory
The answer to that is generally negative, thanks to the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in Crookes v Newton in 2011. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
  Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Judge Mark Bennett entered a consent decree on February, 28, 2014, resolving the brought by the EEOC in EEOC v. [read post]