Search for: "United States v. Apple Inc."
Results 121 - 140
of 909
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2020, 8:02 am
United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), which held that the acquisition of cell-site location information was a Fourth Amendment search). [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
In Apple Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
In Apple Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:31 pm
The decision is Pham v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
”[8] The Louisiana expense attribution provisions outlined above are based on federal tax provisions aimed at preventing United States taxpayers from claiming deductions for amounts incurred to generate income not included in federal taxable income by the United States.[9] There are two Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) provisions on which the Louisiana law is based: Section 265, which addresses the treatment of interest expense… [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am
Google Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
When faced with a “one bad apple” gives every investor a rescission right, defense counsel frequently interpose “estoppel” or similar equitable defenses. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:52 am
Apple, Inc., September 11, 2020, per curiam). [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
In support of this argument, Mooppan and CSS lawyer Lori Windham repeatedly cited Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 1:15 pm
The Office submitted a proposed rulemaking to the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) last month with the aim of formalizing recent practices under precedential opinions including Apple Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:06 am
“Unlike some jurisdictions, here in the United States we continue to see strong demand for cash,” he said during a panel on cross-border payments and digital currencies hosted Monday by the International Monetary Fund. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 5:30 am
Apple a case over a clear antitrust violation.Interestingly, Apple's lawyers made pretty much the same points in footnote 15 of their opposition (filed on Tuesday) to Epic's motion for a preliminary injunction, undoubtedly in light of Judge Gonzalez Roger's mentioning of that decision in the late-August TRO hearing:"The 5-4 decision in Apple Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:30 am
Filed August 13, 2020 United States […] [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 11:45 am
Apple, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:12 am
On Monday afternoon, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held an Epic Games v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 11:16 am
Rebel Oil Co., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:26 am
Approximately 18 hours ago, a clerk's notice already mentioned the possibility of Epic Games' antitrust action against Apple over its App Store terms and policies being reassigned to Oakland-based United States District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
