Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics" Results 121 - 140 of 1,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Ronald Mann
The most noteworthy point in the argument came almost immediately after Benjamin Horwich rose to argue for the United States. [read post]
  It is a question that has come before the United States Supreme Court on two prior occasions: When can a state require an out-of-state seller to collect and remit sales tax? [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 am by tom
BAYER CORP. 09-1298    GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by John Elwood
Texas and United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
The article is based in part on a systematic analysis of the political debates relating to politically defining actions of the federal government in this nation’s early history: the incorporation of the First Bank of the United States in 1791; the decision to allow the bank’s charter to expire in 1811; and the decision to incorporate the Second Bank of the United States in 1816. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm by Josh Blackman
(The state Solicitor General had planned this challenge well before the order was even signed). [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:18 am by Nabiha Syed
United States (consolidated with General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:44 pm by Gene Quinn
Chakrabarty On June 16, 1980, 30 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark patentable subject matter decision in the case of Diamond v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
  Moreover in the process of racing toward remedy, there was a chance that the U.S. legal system, might be exposed to collateral damage--or more tactfully put, that its rules and systems of process might undergo dynamic change in the process of vindication claims (at least to the extent that such dynamic transformation is advanced by litigants and embraced by courts). [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 12:13 pm by Tobias Thienel
At which point is the Convention itself so clear as to rule out interpretation 'in the light of present-day conditions' (see Tyrer v United Kingdom, para 31)? [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:48 am by Adam Wagner
As a result, the applicants were ineligible to vote in the United Kingdom General Election on 6 May 2010. [read post]