Search for: "United States v. Rogers & Rogers" Results 121 - 140 of 1,651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
” it is appropriate to start with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, promulgated by the United Nations General Assembly in December 1948. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 9:45 am
The first inference is that the “country” governing licenses executed by North Americans must be the United States because Maryland is part of the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 4:45 am by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford Yesterday’s oral argument in Morrison v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:17 pm by Eva Galperin and Nate Cardozo
Our Ethiopia case is an example of a country deciding not to play by the rules, unleashing the Ethiopian national security apparatus on a dissident living in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:18 am by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford That’s the question, sort of, raised in Totes-Isotoner v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am by Emma Svoboda
On Jan. 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S, v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:11 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
United States is, ultimately, a simple case. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:14 pm by Roger Alford
It is pending in a tribunal established by an international treaty, the BIT between the United States and Ecuador. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:39 am by Roger Alford
According to the statute, such an asset is one that is: “(A) held in the United States for a foreign securities intermediary doing business in the United States, (B) a blocked asset [defined as those involving Peterson v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 12, 1975. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:53 am by Evan Shultz
Turner’s own lawyer disagreed with the position of the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 6:25 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
And a seat became open on the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:55 am by Roger Alford
If a BIT arbitration panel concludes that Chevron has been denied due process, this would significantly bolster arguments that the foreign judgment should not be enforced in the United States under the Hilton v. [read post]