Search for: "United States v. Sutton" Results 121 - 140 of 340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am by Adam Gillette
For reasons that I am too lazy to look up, the decision that the Supreme Court overturned is not from a Circuit Court of Appeals but from a panel of one judge from the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and two from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:15 am by Josh Blackman
Because this issue will be resolved entirely on the basis of state law, an appeal to the United States Supreme Court will not be possible. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:52 pm by Bexis
United States, 306 F.3d 938, 947-48 (9th Cir. 2002); and Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm by Miriam Seifter
The government faced an uphill battle in Wednesday’s argument in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:00 pm
Because the issue was not before them neither the majority opinion nor the dissent mentioned Sutton v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
While the criminal charges were dismissed due to the crimes being time-barred, the prosecutor still requested the Pesaro judge to issue a confiscation order for the bronze, based on Italian cultural heritage law.[14] While the Getty Trust opposed this order, in 2019 the Court of Cassation confirmed it, thus making it final under Italian law.[15] Legal Issues and the ECtHR Judgement In order to obtain the actual return of the statue, the Pesaro prosecutor had to seek the recognition and enforcement… [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:57 am by Lyle Denniston
Lopez in 1995 and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  "Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is joined by California Supreme Court Justice Leondra Kruger for conversation inspired by his book, Who Decides? [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Wednesday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]