Search for: "United States v. Englander" Results 121 - 140 of 2,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The parties envisaged performance of the hisab in the United States. [read post]
5 May 2023, 5:34 am by David Pocklington
Frank Cranmer: The Constitution Unit: Church and state in European monarchies, (4 May 2023). [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
The Respondents, who were appointed as receivers of TCT by the High Court of England and Wales, caused TCT to present a voluntary petition for relief in New York under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and TCT was placed into insolvency proceedings in New York on the basis that (i) nearly all of TCT’s 60,000 creditors were located in Canada or the US; and (ii) TCT as a trust was treated as a separate legal entity under US law. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:56 am by INFORRM
Where a defendant in a libel claim is not domiciled in the United Kingdom, another Member State or a state which is a contracting party to the Lugano Convention, claimants have a very difficult task in obtaining evidence to satisfy the Court that of all the places in which the statements complained of have been published England and Wales is clearly the most appropriate jurisdiction to bring the claim. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 12:04 am by Michelle M. Mello, Wendy E. Parmet
Exercises of public health powers in the United States must stay within a constitutionally established framework. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am by Alessandro Cerri
 The First Defendant applied for International Trade Mark registrations (ITMRs) in respect of its logo and the word ICE, and these were registered at World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) on 18 June 2015 in respect of "floor cleaning machines" in class 7, based on an earlier registration in the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 8:40 am
Justice Scalia challenged Waxman to name a single precedent in which a non-citizen held outside the sovereign territory of the United States (or England) was entitled to habeas even though no statute so provided. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm by Phil Cave
  While some of the England [United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
  Following the widely read post on 2017 cases, this is my selection of the most legally and factually interesting cases from Australia, New Zealand, Canada, United States and England from the past year. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:03 pm by H. Scott Leviant
For those of you who recognized that the Ninth Circuit got it 100% right when it found in Morris v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Background The First Claimant, Bussey Law Firm PC, is a law firm in the state of Colorado, in the United Statements. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:34 am by Beck, et al.
We have no intention of wading into the treacherous (and heated) debate about Citizens United v. [read post]