Search for: "United States v. Mendez"
Results 121 - 140
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Rossignol failed to demonstrate that, under the governing statutory standard, he was entitled to disability retirement benefits.Group prayer while on dutyMarrero-Mendez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
United States silly-case-name award. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 7:35 am
Board of Education there was Mendez v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
Mendez, a Fourth Amendment case stemming from a police search that resulted in a shooting. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
United States DOL, et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
United States DOL, et al. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
., United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 27, 2008 Mendez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:49 am
Mendez of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California upheld a California Bankruptcy Court order permitting the City of Vallejo, California to reject a collective bargaining agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:23 pm
Qualified Immunity In 1989, the United States Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Hardison, 432 US 63, 84 (1977). [2] See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
