Search for: "United States v. Sharpe"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:29 am
28 Jun 2018, 5:34 am
United States, Nieves v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
The critical decision was, I think, Davis. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm
With those concerns in mind, Reinhard first unsuccessfully sought rehearing en banc (with the support of the United States as amicus curiae), before filing a petition for certiorari. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
The development of the birth control pill, which was first available in the United States in 1960, meant that women could engage in sexual activity with at least some protection against unwanted pregnancy. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
Under a line of cases beginning with United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Below is a brief summary of issues before the Court last week: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Sharp–(32 Cal. 2d 711)–Decided at the Supreme Court of California, this becomes the first case to find that anti-miscegenation laws in the United States were a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 11:44 am
Facts: This case (Marland et al v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:08 pm
Koh of the United States District Court denied automotive supplier Continental's motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the Avanci patent pool firm and several of its members (Nokia, Sharp, Conversant, Optis). [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
See, for example, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v United States, 491 U.S. 617, 623 n. 3, 109 S Ct 2646, 105 L. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm
The problem is that Citizens United was a sharp and unjustified break with prior precedent. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
United States, 2016 WL 6661146 (D. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to bar within a matter of hours--ex parte, i.e., without a hearing--Avanci, Nokia, Sharp, Conversant (which has very recently become the third and latest Avanci member to sue Daimler for patent infringement, as I reported earlier today), and Optis from seeking another AAII against Continental in Germany.Today's TRO motion renews the original pursuit of a U.S. antisuit injunction against… [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:38 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:31 am
Do recent changes to Schedule 7 powers make Beghal v United Kingdom moot? [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Schmid, The Real Shariah Risk: Why the United States Cannot Afford to Miss the Islamic Finance Moment, (University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2013, No. 3, 2013).Davi S. [read post]
