Search for: "Zurich American Insurance Company " Results 121 - 140 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
JUST CLICK ON THE CASE NAMES BELOW… Appellate Court Compensation Case Zurich American Insurance Company v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
., LEMIC Insurance Company and Zurich American Insurance Company -- in Louisiana state court for violations of the Louisiana Racketeering Act. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 6:04 am by Administrator
He claimed that American Home Assurance (AIG) and Zurich Life Insurance wrongfully denied him disability and medical benefits, and that Kumtor and its parent company (Cameco) breached the employment contract . . . [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:29 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
    Hoffman is accused of fraudulently billing the City of Los Angeles and 19 insurance companies including Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies, California State Compensation Insurance Fund, Chartis division of American International Group, CNA Commercial Property and Casualty Insurance, Crum & Forster Holdings Corporation, Employers Insurance, FirstComp Insurance, Fireman’s Fund Insurance… [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:46 am
In August 2008, the Texas Supreme Court held in a 7-2 decision that Zurich American Insurance Company, Federal Insurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company had a duty to defend Susman Godfrey's client, Nokia, Inc, in a series of class actions pending around the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Zurich American Insurance Company et. al v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:27 am by hllawfirm
& Zurich American Insurance was a retaliation claim against Noodles & Co. and their workers’ compensation insurer. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:00 am by Bob Ambrogi
Its customers include major law firms such as Dentons, Clifford Chance, Wilson Sonsini, and McDermott Will & Emery, as well as Fortune 500 companies including Verizon, Dell, and Zurich. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In another Illinois Appellate Court case, it was found that when the insurance company benefited from the common fund created solely by the insured’s attorney, the fact the insured’s policy allowed the insurance company to recover medical payments made through its underinsured-motorist coverage, did not negate its obligation to pay the insured’s attorney for his services in creating the common fund. [read post]