Search for: "Givens v. Street"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 3,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2013, 6:35 am
Fteja v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 10:32 pm
What puzzles me slightly, particularly given the stated aim of consistency, is the difference in approach to that of Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 289 (which I briefly discussed here). [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:31 pm
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the refusal charge for "lack of probable cause with3 N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.2(a) provides that drivers who operate a "motor vehicle on any public road, street or highway or quasi-public areas in the State shall be deemed to have given . . . consent to the taking of samples of his breath for the purpose of making chemical tests to determine the content of alcohol in [the operator's] blood. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
In California v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:26 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr discusses a good ruling out of the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
These sites also listed the victim's new name as well as her original given name and her Louisiana address. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:16 am
In essence, cheap household items were bought on the high street and eyes and mouths drawn on plastic were then fixed to them, and the resulting figures were then simply manipulated by hand (as can be seen in the YouTube video link given above), to create the drama. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:59 am
The AmeriKat relocated from the leafy legal maze of Holborn to the less leafy, but no less legal, maze of Liverpool Street two months ago. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:09 pm
An interesting case, Syed v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 7:54 am
People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
“Though [she] had not given [him] permission to use her Verizon wireless connection, [he] had clearly done so. [read post]
21 May 2014, 2:44 pm
According to the Wall Street Journal, shareholders challenged 94% of all corporate mergers in 2013, up from 44% in 2007. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 7:10 am
The case is State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 7:10 am
The case is State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
They couldn’t believe the country could be so ungrateful to them after all the great benefits they had given. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 8:03 pm
Given the magnitude of the question at issue, one would think PHH Corporation v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
| Brussels court in FN Herstal v Heckler & Koch wrestles with combination invention v mere aggregation of features | Brexit: requests to Govt from IP professional bodies | Street heart: urban murals as common goods | Have your say on the UK implementation of the EUPortability Regulation: public consultation now open! [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:19 am
FTC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
Given the recent “security breach” at 500 Poydras Street, a number of scoundrels might be at risk if I DO become homicidal. [read post]
