Search for: "Holm v. Holm"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,880
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2014, 10:50 am
Indyne, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:32 am
Stewart v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
It is an act for which he or she is accountable under the Constitution: As Justice Holmes stated almost a century ago in Biddle v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:40 am
In this panel, a group of attorneys will discuss the impact of several cases that EFF has been tracking closely, including Tarantino v Gawker, the battle over whether Sherlock Holmes is in the public domain, and an appellate court’s decision to force YouTube to remove “The Innocence of Muslims. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Published in 1982, A Common Law grew out of Guido’s 1977 Holmes Lectures at Harvard Law School. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
V. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2004] 2 AC 208 (HL(E)) establishes that it is not possible to carve out a section 17 duty to house families where children are already accommodated. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a… [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
” [Abrams v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:06 am
The unanimous ruling in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
Guste v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm
Another: Holmes was right, better to have judges not try. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Mowdy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
In a 2007 dissent in James v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
Holmes, 385 F.3d 786, 790-91 (D.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
Holmes, Benjamin Cardozo, Louis Brandeis, and Robert Jackson, and Judge Learned Hand). [read post]
