Search for: "Line v. State" Results 1381 - 1400 of 28,920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2014, 4:42 am by SHG
After learning of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 3:39 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
As explained in Hesham Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] 1 WLR 4799, Parliamentary and public concern about failures to deport large numbers of foreign citizens who had committed serious offences in the UK led to the adoption of the UK Borders Act 2007, which provided that for the purpose of the Secretary of State’s power to deport under the 1971 Act, the deportation of a foreign criminal is conducive to the public good. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:10 am
The case involves an Establishment Clause challenge to crosses placed on public property by the Utah Highway Patrol Association to memorialize state Highway Patrol officers who died in the line of duty. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:42 pm by Mary Dwyer
Isaacson 13-402 Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit correctly held that the “viability” line from Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:15 am by Patricia Salkin
” Preservation of Wainscott, Inc. v New York State Public Service Commission, 2023 NY Slip Op 02510 (2d Dept. 5/10/23). [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:46 am
From the days of Geoffrey through 2011, the states were largely victorious in corporate income tax nexus cases involving "foreign" holding companies. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am by Phil Dixon
North Carolina adopted Whren under the state constitution in State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 2:31 pm
According to the Court, the strike action envisaged by the FSU has the effect of making less attractive, or pointless, Viking Line's exercise of its right to freedom of establishment, because its aim is to prevent both Viking Line and its Estonian subsidiary from enjoying the same treatment in the host member State (Estonia) as other economic operators established in that State. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 6:45 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonVanderminden, A Family LTD Partnership v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]