Search for: "Matter of Allen" Results 1381 - 1400 of 2,969
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2008, 9:32 am
Allen, Independent Directors in MBO Transactions: Are They Fact or Fantasy? [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Cordell Parvin
How much time do you waste each day on things that really do not matter? [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:16 pm
In my least downloaded article -- a tribute to Chancellor Allen -- I trace the history of Revlon and show how Chancellor Allen originally treated it like a special application of the business judgment rule. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:23 am by James R. Marsh
Maybe having pictures as evidence doesn't matter after all. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 11:54 pm by charonqc
It won’t, of course, be of any interest or appeal  to the horde of ‘party whore’ bloggers and twitterers who toe the party line – of whatever party – no matter how absurd their stance may be. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 9:43 am by jadamengel
Listen to an earlier podcast of Mike Allen discussing the case by clicking this link: Scott Sloan Talks with Mike Allen about the latest on the Widmer Case Widmer’s further appeals will become increasingly difficult. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 4:32 am by SHG
Will the video incriminate some, exculpate others, provide evidence that matters? [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 12:35 pm
The Court determined this was a liquidated damages provision as a matter of law, and that it did not constitute a penalty. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm by Charon QC
  David Allen Green’s firm Preiskel is acting… as this twitter post indicates. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
However, after years of legan wrangling, the matter has been settled, only a few days before the singers were to take the stand. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:02 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
If convicted, Allen faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in federal prison. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
  Again, according to Allen:  "in 2007 only one director received a majority against vote at a company with majority voting. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, legal malpractice claims which would otherwise be barred by the statute of limitations are timely if the doctrine of continuous representation applies (see Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 91-94 [1982]; Alizio v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 126 AD3d 733, 735 [2015]; Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 164), in which case the three-year statute of limitations is tolled for the period following the alleged malpractice “until the attorney’s continuing representation of… [read post]