Search for: "Matter of Arthur"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the matter styled APHA v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:55 pm
In a published decision filed September 15, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal reversed and remanded a trial court’s post-judgment order granting an unsuccessful CEQA petitioner’s motion to tax the entire $64,144 cost bill of respondent City. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 4:07 pm
“Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:55 pm
The opinion undoubtedly reaches the correct result as a matter of both law (because the Class 5 exemption plainly did not apply on its face to the GPA) and equity (because the City’s attempted justification that it had always ignored the lower end of the residential density ranges in its General Plan was, to put it mildly, an unappealing position). [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 10:57 am
Becoming a justice is just a matter of luck. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 4:28 am
You must remember that every case, no matter how mundane, is the most important case to your client. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 1:50 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
As we reflect on these matters, we should also take some time to think fundamentally about how we select vice presidents. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:37 am
And as a matter of law “[a]n agency’s finding a project comes within the historical resource exemption necessarily includes the finding the project complies with the Secretary’s Standards” and also includes “an implied finding the project does not have a significant impact on the environment. [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:13 pm
Going back to the 1980s, then-deputy editor Arthur Sulzberger Jr. deemed diversity the “single most important issue” the paper faced and began pressuring managers to actively seek and promote a more diverse workforce. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:21 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 8:33 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:30 am
Making matters worse, it’s possible that Fumo will testify he received this general advice relating to document destruction and subpoenas at some point before July 30, 2002, the day the new obstruction of justice statute -- which has a much broader reach, covering any destruction or other tampering done with intent to obstruct a federal investigation, no matter how far removed -- became law. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:03 am
At the beginning of our conversation, I asked Justice Stevens about the assertion from the Judicature essay and he surprised me by talking about his experience in Chicago with pro bono cases, including criminal matters. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:35 pm
” Ultimately, the determination of whether or not the Complex could “reasonably be beneficially used without the Project … is not a matter of law but instead requires a weighing of the competing interests laying claim on the Complex” — a weighing entrusted to the City’s discretion subject only to deferential judicial review for “substantial evidence” support. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
In concluding “that the health risks to workers and residents identified by petitioners do not constitute ‘substantial adverse effects on human beings’ or otherwise create a fair argument that the disturbance of contaminated soil may have a significant effect on the environment[,]” the Court stated as a prefatory matter: “To begin with, and while we need not and do not decide the issue here, we note that it is far from clear that adverse effects confined… [read post]
