Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,453
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am
That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:55 am
In a recent opinion piece, I argued that the text and structure of the Constitution, a serious commitment to the rule of law and plain good sense combine to preclude a rigid policy of “delaying any indictment of a president for crimes committed in winning the presidency. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 9:45 am
Or I could talk about judges whose behavior was not mere sloppy or unethical but criminal: Walter Nixon, Otto Kerner, Harry Claiborne (who continued to preside over cases from his prison cell), and Alcee Hastings (whose "accountability" for selling favorable treatment to a defendant was to become one of the most senior members of the leadership of the House of Representatives). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
Toronto : Emond Montgomery Publications, 2010 v, 157 p. ; 28 cm. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Last month, Governor Jay Nixon of Missouri postponed an execution after the European Union threatened to cut off shipments of propofol, a common surgical anesthetic, if the state moved forward with its plan to use the drug in its new lethal injection procedure. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:58 am
Nixon nombró el Comité Ad Hoc para el Desarrollo del ELA en 1973 y participó en la redacción del Pacto de Unión Permanente entre Puerto Rico y Estados Unidos, conocido como El Nuevo Pacto, en 1975. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
What happens when the President simply thinks that he is not merely above the law but that, in Richard Nixon’s infamous words, “when the President does it, that means it is not illegal” at all? [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
And even President Nixon said okay. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
SO, HERE’S THE BOTTOM-LINE… In 1954, Brown v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
“Trump Prepares to Offer Clemency to More Than 100 People in His Final Hours in Office,” reported yesterday’s Washington Post. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
Noah Feldman’s superb new book, The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President, is filled with fascinating insights relevant to contemporary American law and politics. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
On Aug. 7, the House Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit asking a federal court in D.C. to force Don McGahn, former White House counsel, to comply with the committee’s subpoena for his testimony. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
On October 25 & 26, Windsor Law proudly hosted the 2019 conference of the Canadian Association for Legal Ethics. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm
Wilkins goes on: In Thompson v. [read post]
