Search for: "People v High" Results 1381 - 1400 of 15,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  In 2011 he featured at number 17 in the MediaGuardian’s 100 most powerful people in media, the paper suggesting that his rulings had “shaped UK libel and privacy law, and in the process made him the country’s most controversial high court judge”. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The US Supreme Court has good news for people that are tired of paying high prices for printer cartridges – the fine print of the “license agreement” in the boxes that prohibits you from refilling the cartridges is no longer effective. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The US Supreme Court has good news for people that are tired of paying high prices for printer cartridges – the fine print of the “license agreement” in the boxes that prohibits you from refilling the cartridges is no longer effective. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:08 pm by Mitu Gulati
  I’ve read or skimmed almost all of the anti-Aurelius briefs in the Aurelius v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:39 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
The ACLU came to our defense, winning a landmark Supreme Court decision in Tinker v Des Moines (1969). [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:06 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
We started fighting the military's ban on gay people back in 1970, and brought Witt v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am by steven perkins
It expresses both the aspirations of indigenous peoples around the world and those of States in seeking to improve their relations with indigenous peoples. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:29 pm by Nassiri Law
  A new report by Oxfam America asserts workers in U.S. poultry processing plants risk high rates of injury, illness, difficult working conditions and unsympathetic bosses. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:08 am by S
All of the other cases in the High Court which deemed a young person to have been provided with accommodation under s.20 were wrongly decided. 2) An authority, where it has unlawfully failed to provide accommodation under s.20, has a discretion to treat young people who are now over 18 as if they were former relevant children. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear oral argument in a trio of high-profile employment-discrimination cases. [read post]