Search for: "State of Minnesota v. United States"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
Ex Parte Schmieding (12:01 Tuesday) A new model for patent and trademark depository libraries (Director’s Forum) Patent backlog hinders nation’s job creation (PatentlyBIOtech) US patent counts, 2010 (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) 2011 patent reexamination filings continue uptrend (Patents Post-Grant) Avoiding a stay pending patent reexamination: Osmose v Arch Chemicals; Richtek v uPI Semiconductor (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court… [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:42 am
(It is worth noting that some states—but not Minnesota, in the case of private employers—separately prohibit inquiries regarding criminal history early on in the selection process). [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Nakanishi, john a. powell, Maria Blanco, Howard Winant Indigenous Peoples: Response to the Periodic Report of the United States to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Tribal Self-Government in the United States John Dossett When Affirmative Action Was White Ira Katznelson The Importance of Targeted Universalism john a. powell, Stephen Menendian & Jason Reece Implicit Bias A Forum – eds. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 6:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:07 am
Kiel v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm
” United States The New Hampshire Supreme Court for a third time has ruled in favour of protecting the privacy of a 19-year-old murder victim. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128 (1998), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that: [P]recedent limits the per se rule in the boycott context to cases involving horizontal agreements among direct competitors. [. . .] [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:06 am
Such is the value of the use-based trademark legal system of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 4:49 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesState of Minnesota v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
See Raheel Ahmad Khan, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:49 pm
This case will cause many to consider anew the issue of whether there should be a "loser pays" system in the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:59 am
It was also the subject of legal action, State of Washington v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm
United States The Justice Department’s Civil Division told a federal appellate court that it will continue to try and defend former President Donald Trump in a libel suit brought by E. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 1:01 am
Kent Courtney, national chairman of the Conservative Society of America, charged that “Justice Fortas ruled with the Communists, with Communist individuals on behalf of the Communist conspiracy, and voted against the Congress of the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:51 am
It nearly destroyed her. * United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:16 am
Defendant 3M moved to exclude plaintiffs’ causation expert witnesses, in its Minnesota state court cases, under the so-called Frye standard. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
