Search for: "State v. Downes" Results 1381 - 1400 of 36,909
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 8:55 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I was at the Supreme Court this morning for the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:29 am by INFORRM
The Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights today handed down its long awaited judgment in the case of MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04). [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Brandon Gatto
The goal of the endeavor is to counteract the 2010 US Supreme Court [official website] decision of Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:38 am
The Supreme Court of the United States issued a long-awaited decision in Brown v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:50 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Recently I'd noticed a remarkable December dissent (pdf) by Justice Patrick Pirtle of the Amarillo 7th Court of Appeals which opined:I am bothered by the frequency with which prosecutors of this State have turned to section 37.09 of the Texas Penal Code to “double-down” on defendants by seeking a second conviction for “tampering with evidence” when an accused merely acts to dispossess himself or herself of evidence of another crime. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Virginia, in which the Supreme Court in 1967 struck down a state law barring marriage by couples of different races. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 9:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In a 9th Circuit decision handed down in January 2013, the court of appeals found that the Medical Device Amendments (MDA) to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act were not a wedge to prevent a plaintiff from making a state negligence claim against Medtronic. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am by Natasha Nguyen
Before the Court of Appeal could consider the art 10 issue, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Sugar v BBC [2012] UKSC 4. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
The judgment handed down yesterday, Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) was a public judgment and was said to be expressed in muted or anodyne terms by the Lord  Justice Maurice Kay. [read post]