Search for: "State v. Strange" Results 1381 - 1400 of 2,180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2012, 5:25 pm
He was ultimately rescued by fishermen working off a mother ship, the Duarte V. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:39 am by V.Venkatesan
The Jan Lokpal Bill, available here specifies in section 18(v) that once a complaint has been made against a person, a list of all his moveable and immoveable assets is to be made and notified, after which no transfer of these assets will be permissible in law. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:04 am by Joe Virene
” Going back to the 1895 Oriental Hotel v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:04 am by Steve Hall
About 3,300 inmates are on death row in the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That's unusual, as federal courts like to defer to the evidentiary findings of state courts. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 8:18 am by Steven Eversole
Additional Resources: Police arrest teenager linked to at least three Birmingham robberies, August 19, 2015, AL.com, by Adam Ganucheau More Blog Entries: Batts v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:10 am by SHG
"The basic defect of the Adam Walsh Act, as applied, is that it imposes a mandatory limit on freedom of an accused without permitting an 'adversary hearing,'" Weinstein held in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:53 am
The Supreme Court's recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:58 pm
This Article offers a comprehensive examination of the Skidmore standard for judicial review of agency legal interpretations as applied by the courts in the period since the Supreme Court revitalized Skidmore in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:50 am by michael a. livingston
That a then Yale professor and later Federal judge (Ralph Winter) was the brains behind the original challenge to campaign finance laws, in Buckley v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:03 pm
The OCC's strange "enforcement preemption" argument--under which substantively non-preempted state law could not be enforced by the states--was thus rejected. [read post]