Search for: "Watson v. Watson"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star (Sheffield)… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Vendors of goods and services utilize standard form contracts to reduce or minimize transaction costs and to ensure consistency in the terms applied to similar transactions. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 5:17 am
” Smith v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
On the same day Ritchie J handed down judgment in the case of Armstrong Watson LLP v Persons Unknown [2023] EWHC 762 (KB) setting out his reasons for granting a without notice injunction at a private hearing in a case where the claimant law firm had been subject to a hack of its IT systems and a subsequent blackmail attempt. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
Rudisill v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
Firstly, the IPCC and the Metropolitan Police v The Guardian (clause 1). [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
United States, supra, 98 U.S. at page 164; Watson v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:00 am
Kelly v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
After the furore about Tom Watson MP and others blocking government libel reform plans the other day it was ironic that the Court of Appeal handed down some serious common sense and justice the next day to get a grip on the runaway horse of libel law. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Straut, Due Process Disestablishment: Why Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 1:34 pm
By: Mark Magas [3/23/22] A non-disclosure agreement (“NDA” or “confidentiality agreement”) is a legally enforceable contract that creates a duty for one or more parties to keep certain information confidential. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 10:56 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
The claim in Watson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 6:53 am
District Judge Linda V. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
In a year when at least one parent and one campaigner had been held in contempt of court for breach of that law (albeit a breach of a specific injunction rather than the rules per se – see Doncaster MBC v Watson [2011] EWHC 2376, the last in a series of judgments in that case [update 5 July : in fact there is a later judgment Doncaster MBC v Watson [2011] EWHC 2498 which deals with the question of whether the court could make a suspended order on an… [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
