Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 1381 - 1400 of 6,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 7:50 am
" If Judge Sciarrino's reasoning is extended to all online services that may mean that as a society we don't have an expectation of privacy for password protected digital content. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:49 am by Steve McConnell
"We wish we could dismiss the Stevens case with a few catch-phrases, but it won't be so easy. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:36 am by Eric Goldman
So the opening up of the door to looking at a site’s knowledge will be something that we haven’t seen before, and because of that we’re going to have a lot of questions. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That reads like a jump away from strict scrutiny right down to rational basis scrutiny, which is concerning, especially since we dont know what “enough like” means. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  I hadn't considered it in any detail (and didn't realize, for example, that it was prospective only). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:38 am by Florian Mueller
It's that they didn't request feedback to specific proposals (and that they didn't make more of an effort to have industry provide researchers with confidential information). [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:44 am by Dennis Wilkins
And criminals generally don't vote, don't have money, and, hey, even criminals aren't too fond of criminals.). [read post]
3 May 2007, 8:48 am
No, we don't have the highest opinion of administrative law "judges. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 7:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Dominguez's case hadn't yet come out, so we didn't talk about that. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:04 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
We didn't make a [big] deal of it because we figure a judge is gonna look at the law, not the stupid media in making her decision. [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 11:17 am
You don't want to be a lawyer before them on a Bar discipline matter. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 4:38 am
It's one thing to pretend the rumors don't exist if you're appearing before the judge on a small matter on a law and motion calendar. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:54 pm by Sandy Levinson
  But, of course, we don't ever ask about the constitutional implications of criminalizing, say, shoplifting, drinking in public (as distinguished from carrying guns in public), or failing to give the proper signal when one is preparing to turn. [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:39 am by Ken White
People generally don't ask that about most defendants. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 11:00 am
I figured if he didn't defend himself I could just get the piece of paper I needed and move on. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 2:49 am
A judge told the paper there are two kinds of defendants who end up in court for traffic fines - those who can't pay, and those who forget to do so. [read post]