Search for: "In Interest of Ac"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2024, 4:24 am
Stated differently, at bottom, the F AC alleges that Ms. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:59 am
For firms of solicitors who propose to act for a new client with adverse interests to a former client, a higher standard was laid down in Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG [1999] 2 AC 222: if the solicitors are in possession of confidential information which may be relevant in a matter where the solicitor is acting for a new client with adverse interests, the evidential burden shifts to the solicitors to show that there is no risk that the information will come into the… [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:48 am
Should be interesting, as my O's rep Matt Dougherty notes: It's the Far East match-up, with Taiwan's Chien Ming Wang facing the O's new addition, Koji Uehara -- former ace of the Yomiuri Giants-- in his major league debut. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:38 am
Indeed, as Lord Hoffmann himself said in BCCI v Ali [2002] 1 AC 251 at 269, the primary source for understanding what the parties meant is their language interpreted in accordance with conventional usage. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
This is not merely an interesting legal battle brewing, but a real test of American defamation law. [read post]
6 May 2016, 11:06 am
Ac. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:37 pm
(Now people who can afford it hire ace trial lawyers to give them better odds of prevailing at trial. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
The case is interesting also at a political level. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
Lord Carnwath was not convinced by arguments about the importance of keeping the cases before the IPT protected in the interests of national security; he was satisfied that the Administrative Division of the High Court is capable of putting in place sufficient protections to ensure that sensitive information is protected [112]. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
Foskett J observed that no feature of the Strasbourg jurisprudence has gone so far as to impose the kind of obligation contended for in this case and that it is not open to the domestic courts to move ahead of the European Court of Human Rights in this regard (invoking the principle in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323), a principle which has found further expression in Regina (Al-Skeini and others) v Secretary of State for Defence [2008] 1 AC 153 (see in… [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am
”No doubt there is a long and interesting story to this litigation and there are hints of this in the judgment. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Lord Carnwath was not convinced by arguments about the importance of keeping the cases before the IPT protected in the interests of national security; he was satisfied that the Administrative Division of the High Court is capable of putting in place sufficient protections to ensure that sensitive information is protected [112]. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 9:03 am
Would you, as a member of the AC, even bother reading it? [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
Cunningham, for example, argues that by having a judicial policy of favouring arbitration, the American courts might be putting their interest ahead of the contracting parties. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
I consider, therefore, that the only part of the defendant’s submission which warrants serious consideration is the contention that a defendant is entitled to the defence of qualified privilege if he honestly and reasonably believed that the person to whom he published the words complained of had a duty or interest as to the matters referred to in the communication. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am
Additionally, the court should refrain from promising the child any particular outcome in the case.In evaluating whether visitation with a grandparent is in a child’s best interests, the most significant consideration is the nature and quality of the relationship between the grandparent and the childIn Matter of Marilyn Y. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 5:25 am
” V. interesting! [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
” Innogenetics, 512 F.3d at 1379.Before assessing irreparable harm and public interest, the district court reviewed the characteristics of the market place. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
Third, a substantial federal issue is more likely to be present if “[t]he Government . . . has a direct interest in the availability of a federal forum to vindicate its own administrative ac- tion. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
It is not enough for the Federalist Society (nor would it be for the ACS) to assure that compatible judges are nominated. [read post]
