Search for: "People v. Peters"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
The certainly-Irish-Canadian Peter Ryan has all the details. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
The cases are American Institute of Physics et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:01 pm
Peter. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
Sources [1] Bikram’s Yoga Coll. of India, L.P. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:14 am
In Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Peter [smiley face]. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:12 pm
United StatesBarr v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm
I am not sure how many people actually have the long view over time, or the wider view internationally. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:09 pm
More broadly, this is a version of the very old point (for which Peter Westen's classic article, The Empty Idea of Equality, is usually cited), that most of the work in the requirement that similarly situated people be treated similarly is done by figuring out what counts as similar. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:09 pm
In Henson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 1:31 am
Some people don't like Lisp syntax, but it has several major technical advantages over its competitors. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am
(In two later applications, RM v UK (no. 29080/22) and HN v UK (no. 29084/22)), the Court also decided to apply an interim measure under Rule 39 staying their removal.) [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm
The case may be better understood as a political gesture, operationalizing the “promise” made in Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Peter Jaszi: WIPO’s greatest failing may be in its educational activities, heavily weigh [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
To add to these difficulties, people are living longer, which means they need their retirement income to last longer. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
” Cariou v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:01 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
