Search for: "Sharpe v. State"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 3:47 am
That’s one of the issues on appeal from the 8th District’s decision last December in State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
Sharp, saying it had ??? [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Waradzin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 1:08 pm
Ascentive, LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm
., v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:05 am
In sharp contrast, opposition to the Roe trimester test was widespread. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
IntroductionOn 9 May 2019, the South African Constitutional Court, the highest appellate court in South Africa, heard its first ever patent litigation case in Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited v Merck Sharpe Dohme Corporation. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
IntroductionOn 9 May 2019, the South African Constitutional Court, the highest appellate court in South Africa, heard its first ever patent litigation case in Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited v Merck Sharpe Dohme Corporation. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
Almost every newspaper, local and national has carried hysterical and inaccurate pieces setting out doomsday scenarios if section 40 is enacted and consistently misdescribing the Leveson system of audited self-regulation as “state backed” (or even “state”) regulation. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 12:52 am
The Court of Appeal clarified in Merck v Merck Sharpe & Dohme [2017] EWCA Civ 1834. that this targeting should be considered on an objective basis. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:34 pm
In 2007, Mr Justice Pumfrey tried to do away with disclosure on obviousness in Nichia v Argos. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am
Massachusetts, which held that states have the power to make vaccination compulsory in the public interest and the 1944 decision in Prince v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
Legal Basis The WPR letter’s stated legal authorities for the armed conflict against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, associated forces, and, since August 2014, the Islamic State (ISIS), are the 2001 and 2002 authorizations for the use of military force (AUMF), the president’s Article II commander-in-chief power, and his “constitutional and statutory authority to conduct the foreign relations of the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
United States, 333 U. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:29 pm
Experts on voting rights see the legal battle over Indiana's toughest-in-the-nation voter identification law as the most starkly partisan case to reach the court since Bush v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:36 pm
In today’s case (Roed v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 12:53 pm
The fractured decision in United States v. [read post]
