Search for: "State v. Harding"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 18,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2022, 1:27 am
As I reported on Tuesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear the Epic Games v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:57 am
Abortion, and more specifically the continuation of the Roe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
The state had previously filed a compliant brief that covered many of the same points, but we ordered replacement briefs in light of Daire v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm
"Hard cases make bad law" goes the cliché.* But in the case of the Williamson County ripeness requirement in federal takings cases, the bad law is an entirely self-inflicted wound and cannot be blamed on lousy facts or hard cases. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 11:50 am
Pike v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:21 am
It may be hard to prove that this was the defendant's intent, but if he can, I think that's good enough. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 5:21 pm
State Univ. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 5:07 am
Womack v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 3:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 4:58 pm
See, e.g., Leventhal v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:36 am
Doe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
3 May 2017, 1:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:23 pm
Northern Securities Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:23 pm
No, said the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 6:19 am
It's hard to get excited about the Rooker-Feldman doctrine in federal court. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 6:07 pm
Rocky Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:30 am
The case is Tighe v. [read post]
