Search for: "State v. Neil"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 3,002
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Rubio has said that he would appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Obergefell v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
* BREAKING: CJEU says that fair compensation for private copying cannot be funded through general state budgetThe CJEU has considered the freedom of implementing the private copying exception, which may be broad but not so broad as to allow for fair compensation to be funded from the general state budget. [read post]
26 May 2021, 12:29 pm
He now claims that his conviction is invalid under McGirt v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:34 pm
The question raised in Shinn v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
Last week the Senate Judiciary Committee wrapped up its hearing on the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
At Slate, Kyla Eastling, Danny Li and Neil Weare regret that the court declined the opportunity to overrule “the Insular Cases, a series of controversial decisions from the era of Plessy v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:42 am
The chief justice (of the United States, that is), then announces that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion of the court in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 10:49 am
Justice Alito announces opinion in Abbott v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 3:49 am
Gee “may well signal the future of abortion rights in the United States. [read post]
18 May 2017, 4:22 am
” Constitution Daily marks the May 17 anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
Briefly: At the Washington Legal Foundation, Jeremy Broggi and Bert Rein write that Justice Neil Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
In June 1969, the Supreme Court announced the modern test that governs when the government may punish speech as incitement in Brandenburg v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:51 pm
Stitt and U.S. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
Neil ponders the legal protection of voice creations. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
It really is a big deal, says Neil. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Last week IPKat was also delighted to host a guest post from Professor Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge) on the state of the debate around the proposed EU press publishers’ right: Sleepwalking towards a perpetual (news?) [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent casesGuest post from Steven Baldwin (Allen & Overy), summarizing 2017's recent patent decisions. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
