Search for: "United States v. Edwards" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2020, 3:01 am by Florian Mueller
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Fortress's first motion to dismiss Apple and Intel's complaint, but also allowed the plaintiffs to amend the complaint. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
The requirement to investigate does not depend on a complaint from the victim or next-of-kin: once the matter has come to the attention of the authorities they must act of their own motion (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II). [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:16 pm by Lovechilde
Counteracting the 2010 Citizens United case and the 1976 Buckley v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
The Illinois / Chicago resource guide for individuals with cerebral palsy and special needs was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm by Adam Feldman
Several patent-related cases, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674, and United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am by Matthew Flinn
In Edwards v United Kinghdom (2002) 35 EHRR 19, it said only that: …there must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results to secure accountability in practice as well as in theory. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am by Susan Brenner
The federal judge to whom the case was assigned began his analysis of this issue by noting that a “challenge to a statute on First Amendment grounds requires that I first consider whether the speech . . . is protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am by Scott Bomboy
” Of course, that litigation process within the states may involve rulings from the United States Supreme Court, as in Bush v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 5:16 am by Ashley Deeks, Matthew Waxman
The Supreme Court has offered snippets of its view on this in some cases, stating in Fleming v. [read post]