Search for: "*long v. U. S" Results 1421 - 1440 of 2,805
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Rosalind English
Lord Kerr dissented from the majority insofar as he considered that the factual issue of why the local authority had taken so long to assess the appellant’s needs and find the right place had to be fully investigated at trial. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am by Joshua Matz
Circuit’s opinion in Latif v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 6:46 pm
Here's a belated report on a recent development in a long-standing issue. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Ramos in Goldstein v Pikus, 2015 NY Slip Op 31455(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 20, 2015], dismissing a petition for judicial dissolution of a New York limited liability company. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 10:27 pm by Howard Knopf
Katz - who teaches both competition and copyright law at the U. of T. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
A few random thoughts on the cases after the jump. 1) These cases, along with last month’s Already LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 6:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
And note that, given that case, the speech need not even be about one of the recipients, so long as it’s intended to annoy or offend one of the recipients. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm by Susan Brenner
After noting the factual basis for the charges against Davis, the judge outlined the standard of review he was to apply in ruling on her motion for a new trial: A district court, `[u]pon the defendant's motion . . . may vacate any judgment and grant a new trial if the interest of justice so requires. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" Thus, New Jersey looks, as we do, to the character and "extent of the clergyman's activities" (Friends of Ahi Ezer Congregation, Inc. v Long Branch City, 16 NJ Tax at 595 [1997]; see also Shrine of Our Lady of Fatima v Mantua Twp., 12 NJ Tax 392, 397-398 [1992]). [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Stone v Moore [2016] SASCFC 50 allowed the defendant’s appeal against a judgment dismissing an action for libel and awarded damages of Aus$2,000. [read post]