Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 2,644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2016, 9:08 am
So argues Defending Daubert: It’s Time to Amend Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 57 Wm. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
Some studies have reported that activist hedge funds are estimated to have over $200 billion of assets under management (as compared to $50 billion in 2010). [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:09 am
Below, relying on the High Court’s 1977 ruling in Abood v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm
Instead, many of their questions centered on whether, even if Friedrichs has a stronger legal argument, the Court should still rule against her based on a legal doctrine known as “stare decisis” – which counsels that the Court should not overturn its prior rulings unless there is a particularly compelling reason to do so. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 7:03 pm
I suggest the extent of the difficulty of criticism from the United States by a reminder of the scope and objectives of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Although some had hoped that the recent omnibus package, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, would withhold funding from enforcement of the Rule, it did not. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
The assessement of compensation under an offer of amends was adjourned on terms. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:53 pm
But Republican primary voters deserve to know, with the kind of specificity and responsiveness you delivered in your nine Supreme Court arguments, how you disagree with Mr. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:33 am
The same provision was included in a 2004 Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
For the second time in the current Term, the Supreme Court on Friday agreed to look into the Puerto Rican government’s authority to manage its own affairs. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:22 am
The court previously held that the advocacy fund was covered by the Labor Management Cooperation Act (LMCA) exception. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:51 am
A specific smoking prohibition rule has yet to be tested in court. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:51 am
A specific smoking prohibition rule has yet to be tested in court. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
And much scholarly attention has been devoted to the Warren Court. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:53 pm
Finally, the Court turned to the defendants’ argument that plaintiffs’ fiduciary duty claim failed to overcome the business judgment rule. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 12:07 pm
The Court went on to explain: Moreover, the fact that Domingo may have consented to the arrangement and received caregiver services in exchange for the Gracas’ use of his funds does not undermine the court’s rulings. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 12:07 pm
The Court went on to explain: Moreover, the fact that Domingo may have consented to the arrangement and received caregiver services in exchange for the Gracas’ use of his funds does not undermine the court’s rulings. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 3:33 pm
The Court was not impressed by this. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 5:26 pm
It appears that the earliest statutory provision providing for proof and payment of contingent or unliquidated claims was made in 1921 through amendment to Sec. 207 Surrogate's Court Act. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
OPR proposes to amend this section to provide guidance to public agencies in applying the principles set forth in the Supreme Court’s decision in Save Tara v. [read post]
